French Lingerie Company Debuts Line for 4-12 Year-Olds

Posted by Kevin Farrell on Aug 19, 2011 in Style | 32 comments

No.

Jours Après Lunes is officially the most hated company in the world this week after debuting a provocative line of sexy lingerie…for children.

The “loungerie” line is intended to allow young girls (ages 4-12) to dress like their mothers. And while that may be the intention, the launch photoshoot featuring young, young, young girls in bras, panties, pearls and pageant hair in come-hither poses misses the mark entirely.

There’s nothing mommy-and-me about these photos. In fact, I doubt we can actually even post them on Facebook, so if you want to get your moral outrage on, check out the Jours Après Lunes site and have an uncomfortable look.

Should 4-year-olds be wearing lingerie? Hell – should 12-year-olds even be wearing lingerie?

(via Fashionista)

http://www.facebook.com/dmripley21 Derek Ripley

And now the punch line to that age old question you should never ask at Victorias Secret, Doe’s this come in children’s sizes? “Why of Course it does!”
What will they think of next?
http://www.facebook.com/dmripley21 Derek Ripley

And now the punch line to that age old question you should never ask at Victorias Secret, Doe’s this come in children’s sizes? “Why of Course it does!”
What will they think of next?
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_5VF2A4AHNJHGKBO5DIS2M5U6BE Samantha

What. The. Hell.
I just had a seizure, thanks.
http://www.facebook.com/steveplittle Steve Patrick

4 year olds are in beauty pageants looking like hookers. What’s the diff?
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001003614127 Angela Stanczak

I’m not looking at that. I’m already scarred for life just knowing that it’s out there…Why did you have to put a link up. I can’t stop myself from clicking links. I don’t wanna see. T^T

http://www.facebook.com/kayci.z.vonsweet Kayci Z Von Sweet

its not that bad. a couple poses are a bit risque for that age, but the clothes themselves are fine. just overpriced kidde undies.

http://www.facebook.com/shanna.gibson Shanna Gibson

I just checked out the website…It just looks like bikinis and panties to me. Nothing raunchy, just high end undies. Now, I don’t have daughters, I have 4 sons…So I might feel differently if I had a daughter. But I don’t see the big deal.

http://www.facebook.com/people/Emily-Phillips/848844856 Emily Phillips

The bras are too sexy, and the poses are DEFINITELY too sexy.
Veronica Williams

It’s one thing to get a little girl a high-end dress. I had plenty of those itchy things from the dress stores. But it’s another thing to have LINGERIE for kids. When I was coming up, we had UNDERWEAR, PANTIES, AND T-SHIRTS. Now kiddie bikinis I have no issue with. But when we’re talkin’ about lingerie for kids, that’s a problem. Huge problem. Sexy, lingerie, and kids should NOT be in the same category point blank.

http://www.facebook.com/cara.t.messer Cara Tillie Messer

Well…. I have mixed feelings. The undies aren’t especially nasty. They seem to have good coverage and all. but… I don’t like the poses of the girls and all the makeup they are wearing. On one hand, I feel like it’s not worse than buying Hello Kitty panties for a kid, but at the same time, it seems so much more wrong.
http://www.facebook.com/people/Emily-Phillips/848844856 Emily Phillips

Oh that is SO creepy.
http://www.facebook.com/Star.Moonshine26 Miranda Elizabeth Lee Kelly

Oh kay will someone explain to me why shit like this is allowed, but gay marriage is not?
Anonymous

OK, I looked at the site, and the stuff isn’t as bad as I expected it to be. However, what does a 4 year old have to put into a bra? The “Jackin it to Jesus Hair” is rediculous, and the poses and pearl are just plain silly.

http://www.facebook.com/people/Tina-Vazquez/670090593 Tina Vazquez

honestly to me it looks like a bunch of little kids playing dress up. I find it adorable and it’s something I have seen and expect to see from little girls. I dont find the bras the least bit sexy, I think they are exactly the sort of cute training bra that fashionable kids will like. I know I would have liked that striped one more than my winnie the pooh one. Which by the way I got at 5. Not because I needed but because I thought it was fun and my mom thought it made me feel good about myself (more grown up). She said I behaved better in it lol.

http://pulse.yahoo.com/_W27KEHFVUKY4GTLNQTBYYVLAAI Shylah Eells

I agree. It just looks like kids playing dress up.
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_W27KEHFVUKY4GTLNQTBYYVLAAI Shylah Eells

I agree. It just looks like kids playing dress up.
Anonymous

As I said, I don’t think it is as bad as some are making it out, however, even after raising two daughters, I don’t know of many 5 year olds that need a training bra. While getting you a training bra at age 5 may have made you feel more grown up, it also leads into the negative stereotype that people have been against ever since the Barbie Doll was introduced.

Where do you draw the line? Girls might as well be going from diapers into maxi pads and tampons, because their parents think they will make their little girl feel more grown up.

http://www.facebook.com/people/Tina-Vazquez/670090593 Tina Vazquez

The poses are a bit too mature but I aint seeing the “sexy” maybe it’s time to tone down the moral outrage and viewing children as sexual while complaining about the sexualization of children. This type of article adds nothing to the discussion. Furthermore I wonder what the writer’s issue is that they find these children too “sexy.”
All I see are training bras (no doubt aimed more for the 9-12 crowd) and some frilly panties.
http://www.facebook.com/estrada.matty Carla Ann Estrada

Okay when I read lingerie, I was outraged, but honestly I looked at the site, and their is nothing sexy about them. They are cute for little kids. Sure the makeup is over done, but the clothes them self are not bad at all.
http://www.facebook.com/Rawr.Is.A.Love.Sound Chrystaline Rae Taylor

The American association for the term “Lingerie” is automatically SEX SEX SEX…but we forget the Lingerie is actually a loose term for “Pretty Underwear” in Europe [France]…I checked the site out expecting something outrageous based on the overblown post…instead I found a few not so appropriate poses of some girls wearing cute underwear. Im not quite sure about the training bras…but the underwear is adorable!
Seriously, there is nothing trashy or sleazy about these undergarments. If you want to see that, just watch Toddlers in Tiaras….
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_W27KEHFVUKY4GTLNQTBYYVLAAI Shylah Eells

I don’t know. These don’t look all that provocative. They kind of look like the ads you see in Shopko or K-Mart magazines. They just look like cute underwear for girls and I don’t think the poses are inappropriate either.
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=194002341 Darek M

wow that has to be illegal in some way. I would NEVER let my kid dress like that, lingerie is made to be romantic and shown off, that should never be shown by children.
http://www.facebook.com/people/Luinne-DLlard/100001583873176 Luinne D’Llard

Lol. We’re here talking about why we should be morally free to be gay, but then going on about how other people are wrong for dressing their kids in expensive underoos. I browsed the whole place; if you find anything dirty with that, the filth is in you.

Though I will say that the hairdos are just awful
http://www.facebook.com/kayci.z.vonsweet Kayci Z Von Sweet

the poses are what make this borderline CP and uncomfortable. the underwear itself is fine for the most part, even adorable….no different than a two piece bathing suit for little kids…but a couple of those poses, ass shot of a little kid in sheer looking underpants, THAT is whats unacceptable.

http://www.facebook.com/kayci.z.vonsweet Kayci Z Von Sweet

another thing, the way their make-up and hair is done, it makes them look like WOMEN, not little girls, which adds to the creeper pedo-bear feel
http://www.facebook.com/kayci.z.vonsweet Kayci Z Von Sweet

another thing, the way their make-up and hair is done, it makes them look like WOMEN, not little girls, which adds to the creeper pedo-bear feel
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_G2WSJS7KMYZQK2ANFWQTKPKYFA Jeremy Cantrell

hell, i think a two piece suit for little kids is inappropriate

Anonymous

I feel so dirty for looking at those pictures. I am now 100% sure I am gay and 1,000,000% sure I am not a pedophile. Might have thrown up a little in my mouth.
http://www.facebook.com/people/Melissa-Rose/100001365271312 Melissa Rose

Is there like a freaking petition people can sign about this thing! If they want to dress like mommy give em one of those comfy old moo moos! A four year old shouldn’t even know what lingerie is! And the marketing…yeah lets put them up on a web site where all the sex offenders can see from their own home! Great job.
http://www.facebook.com/people/Grey-Diamond/1547664306 Grey Diamond

Infantile pornography much ?
http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OVANW433SWRDYLFGY3WF34O5FI Ocean Bar

I had my period at 11 and I was giving some selflove to my v-jay way before that, I would have loved a thong… don’t hate on the virgin freakss. lol
http://www.facebook.com/kristynluvslexi Kristyn Hall

Thats just sick!

Tags

French Lingerie Company Debuts Line for 4-12 Year-Olds

Pages

Tags

French Lingerie Company Debuts Line for 4-12 Year-Olds

Yo Categories

Pages