Home > News > Politics > Separation of Church & Prostate

“Technically, It’s Adam and RIB, Not Adam and Eve…”

Posted by Kevin Farrell on Mar 1, 2012 in Separation of Church & Prostate | 5 comments

If you want to be really technical about it, it’s “Adam and Rib,” not “Adam and Eve.” The relationship between a man and his bone is far more in line with what God originally set in motion than anything with a woman involved.

-Dante Shepherd

(via Surviving the World)

http://www.facebook.com/elizabeth.turney Elizabeth Equality Turney

Adam and the writers of Glee? =o In the immortal words of one George Takei, “Oh myyy”
Anonymous

Actually, since it was a part of Adam it was his CLONE, therefore it was Adam and Adam.
http://www.facebook.com/people/Heather-DeFabis/100000396101693 Heather DeFabis

Where does Lilth fit into all of this? I mean, she was made at the same time as Adam, but she had forsaken him and left the garden.
http://www.facebook.com/people/Erik-Baan/100000490485875 Erik Baan

Hehe, a man and his bone. Cool pun!
http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1172777195 Erin Trinetra Madden

Well Technically it’s a mythical story that is clearly not based in fact… I mean really really? A rib formed into a woman? only a bunch of naked apes or a group of in bred sheeple would give a story like that any credence.

Tags

“Technically, It’s Adam and RIB, Not Adam and Eve…”

Pages

Tags

“Technically, It’s Adam and RIB, Not Adam and Eve…”

Yo Categories

Pages